tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9150561117329868491.post4115673872184788929..comments2023-10-08T20:48:43.878+05:30Comments on My Journey Through IT: Stored proc with ease with SpringDinuka Arseculeratnehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13924080326710656628noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9150561117329868491.post-66106180764873450422010-05-19T09:11:20.270+05:302010-05-19T09:11:20.270+05:30that makes alot of sense... Thx for the suggesstio...that makes alot of sense... Thx for the suggesstion Dave..agreed 100% on the fact that parameter handling should be separated from the mainline code...<br /><br />DinukaDinuka Arseculeratnehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13924080326710656628noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9150561117329868491.post-22023885099197826862010-05-19T03:30:23.322+05:302010-05-19T03:30:23.322+05:30To me it kind of seems like the examples that crea...To me it kind of seems like the examples that create type-safe calls through StoredProcedure subclasses are much cleaner: you call a type-safe method from the SP subclass.<br /><br />The subclass handles in/out parameter declaration, can contain an inner class for mapping (or use a public one if it makes sense, of course). With only a little bit of work and configuration you end up with things Davenoreply@blogger.com